AI Systems Assessments
Understand what's slowing your team down, whether your AI tools are helping, and what needs to change before you invest in another solution.
An AI systems assessment from charmthirteen examines whether your organization has the tools, workflows, data, governance and internal skills to use AI productively. It follows Discover, Assess, Recommend, includes hands-on inspection of your systems and data, and ends with clear priorities for what to keep, change, automate, govern or build.
Discover. Assess. Recommend.
Every assessment moves through the same three stages. We discover how the work happens today, assess it against six dimensions, and recommend what to do next, in priority order and in a sequence your team can realistically carry out. Implementation and training are available afterward as follow-on services, and you're never required to buy a build to get a useful assessment.
Assessments include hands-on inspection of your systems and data. We look at the tools, the workflows and the information your team actually uses, because a survey can't tell you what a spreadsheet, an approval queue, or a shared drive will.
We check whether AI can do the task, and then whether the system you'd end up with would be reliable, governable, maintainable, and useful to the people doing the work.
Three ways to engage
Each package draws on the same six dimensions. The package sets how deep the investigation goes.
AI Systems Snapshot
Find the immediate opportunities.
A focused evaluation for a small business or department that wants to understand its current AI tools, workflow problems, and highest-value opportunities.
Deliverablesfindings summary, tool recommendations, top 3 opportunities, and next-step priorities.
Talk through which one fits ↗ (opens in a new tab)AI Workflow & Readiness Assessment
Understand the processes, people, and data behind the problem.
A deeper engagement involving stakeholder interviews, workflow mapping, data readiness, implementation feasibility, and governance considerations.
Deliverablesworkflow maps, prioritized use cases, data and governance findings, ROI estimates, and a phased roadmap.
Talk through which one fits ↗ (opens in a new tab)AI Governance & Architecture Assessment
Evaluate whether your systems can support reliable, accountable AI.
A specialized assessment for organizations with higher-risk workflows, existing AI systems, fragmented data, or more complex technical requirements.
Deliverablesrisk and control matrix, architecture recommendations, semantic/data mapping findings, evaluation requirements, and implementation roadmap.
Talk through which one fits ↗ (opens in a new tab)From assessment to implementation. charmthirteen can help design, build, train, and document the recommended solution when the client wants support.
AI Adoption & Enablement
After the assessment, you can bring charmthirteen in to carry out the roadmap with your team:
- Claude Skills, Projects, and reusable workflows
- Tool configuration and troubleshooting
- Department-specific training
- AI office hours
- Internal champions and peer mentoring
- Documentation and handoff
- Ongoing evaluation and improvement
Enablement runs as a fixed-scope project or a time-limited advisory arrangement. It doesn't turn into a retainer unless you ask for one.
Six places AI adoption quietly breaks.
These are six dimensions, not six products. Every package looks across them, and the package decides how far into each one we go.
Tooling & Adoption
- What we evaluate
- Existing AI tools, licenses, usage, staff capabilities, redundant subscriptions, integration opportunities
- What you receive
- Tool inventory, adoption gaps, recommendations
Every tool we recommend has to earn its slot under the One-Slot Rule. See it applied in Last Tool Standing →
Workflow & Automation
- What we evaluate
- How employees perform work, repetitive tasks, bottlenecks, handoffs, approval requirements
- What you receive
- Current-state workflow maps, automation opportunities, prioritized use cases
Data & AI Readiness
- What we evaluate
- Data quality, structure, terminology, accessibility, relationships, permissions, integration readiness
- What you receive
- Data-readiness findings, mapping recommendations, remediation priorities
AI Governance & Risk
- What we evaluate
- Policies, sensitive data handling, human oversight, evaluation, accountability, vendor controls
- What you receive
- Risk register, governance recommendations, proposed controls
Implementation & Architecture
- What we evaluate
- Buy-versus-build options, integration feasibility, skills, agents, custom development needs
- What you receive
- Solution options, architecture direction, phased roadmap
Workforce Capability
- What we evaluate
- Employee proficiency, training gaps, support needs, internal ownership
- What you receive
- Training recommendations, enablement plan, ownership model
Data & Semantic Readiness
AI can only work with what your organization has written down, connected, and named consistently. Most readiness checks skip that layer, and it's often the reason an AI tool produces confident answers nobody trusts.
What we examine:
- Data inventory and lineage: where relevant information originates, and how it moves between systems.
- Terminology and definitions: whether different teams use the same terms to mean different things.
- Workflow documentation: whether business rules and approval steps are written down, or exist only in employees' heads.
- Data mapping: whether information can be reliably connected across systems.
- Knowledge architecture: whether a shared semantic model would improve how agents retrieve and interpret your organization's context.
Where knowledge graphs fit
Some teams need better documentation or a searchable knowledge base. Others may genuinely need an ontology, graph-based retrieval, or a richer context layer. A knowledge graph is one possible recommendation when we find fragmented relationships, definitions, or institutional knowledge, and the assessment decides which solution is justified. It is never a standard deliverable.
See a reference architecture from prior work →Reference architecture
How we investigate: the Orbit Framework.
Orbit is charmthirteen's discovery method, and in an assessment it becomes the structure of the investigation itself. The package sets how deep each step goes.
- 01
Pre-Orbit + Entry
Establish your problem, inventory the context available, and identify what needs investigation.
- 02
Mapping
Interview employees, document workflows, identify tools, trace how data moves, and map who is responsible for what.
- 03
Gravity
Quantify what the inefficiency costs, examine root causes, assess risk, and decide whether there's a viable business case.
- 04
Circles Out
Document findings, evidence gaps, unresolved dependencies, and what still needs validation.
- 05
Trajectory
Recommend what to stop, retain, improve, buy, automate, or build, with priorities and a realistic implementation sequence.
Value you can measure, and value you can see.
Some benefits show up as dollars. Others show up as fewer errors, cleaner ownership, or a control that didn't exist last quarter. We measure each one the way it actually shows up.
| Business benefit | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Productivity | Hours saved per workflow, task completion time |
| Quality | Error rates, rework, consistency |
| Tool efficiency | Duplicate licenses, utilization, unnecessary spending |
| Governance | Control coverage, unresolved risks, approval compliance |
| Adoption | Active usage, training completion, employee confidence |
| Sustainability | Documented ownership, support needs, workflow maintainability |
Safe deployment and accountability show up as observable controls and reduced risk. No assessment can promise an organization zero risk, and this one won't pretend to.
AI productivity value estimator
Illustrative model for a workflow assessment, using adjustable assumptions.